In a startling development, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under former President Trump is demanding sanctions against California immigration lawyer Joshua Schroeder, accusing him of filing frivolous motions in a high-stakes deportation case. The DOJ claims Schroeder’s actions not only wasted valuable court time but also attempted to mislead judges about the legal basis for the removal of his client, Vang Lore, a convicted attempted murderer.

The DOJ’s filing reveals a pattern of misconduct, alleging that Schroeder knowingly misrepresented the law, claiming Lore was being removed under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) when, in fact, he was subject to a valid removal order under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The government argues that this “vexatious conduct” has cost taxpayers significantly, requiring multiple court responses to what they describe as “meritless filings.”

Schroeder’s relentless pursuit to stall Lore’s deportation has sparked outrage, with the DOJ asserting that his actions represent a broader trend of attorneys undermining immigration enforcement. The case has escalated to multiple courts, with Schroeder allegedly filing motions across jurisdictions in a desperate attempt to halt the removal process.

The DOJ’s demand for sanctions is not just punitive; it aims to deter similar behavior from other immigration lawyers who might exploit the system to delay lawful removals. “This is a matter of national importance,” the DOJ stated, emphasizing the need to uphold the rule of law and protect public safety.

As the legal battle intensifies, the court’s decision on the DOJ’s request for sanctions against Schroeder could set a significant precedent. The implications of this case resonate beyond the courtroom, raising critical questions about the integrity of legal advocacy in immigration matters. All eyes are now on the court as it prepares to address these explosive allegations.