News

Democrats trying to push bill that ‘would cost average couple $25,000’

Senate Democrats are rushing to push through a Social Security reform bill ahead of Donald Trump taking office that one group estimated would cost the average couple $25,000 in benefits.

The Social Security Fairness Act would repeal two provisions that currently reduce payouts to public sector employees like cops, firefighters, teachers and US Postal workers.

The Committee for a Responsible Budget (CRFB), a bipartisan think tank, argued this change would make Social Security insolvent six months earlier than current projections.

It would do this by giving full benefits to nearly 3 million retirees who paid into state or local pension plans in lieu of paying into Social Security, according to the group.

‘As a result, we estimate a typical dual-income couple retiring in 2033 would see their benefits cut by an additional $25,000 over their lifetime, with over $8,000 of that additional cut coming in the roughly half a year of advanced insolvency,’ the group wrote.

If Social Security runs out of money under the bill’s reforms, the think tank said the average couple could lose out on as much as $400,000 in lifetime benefits.

It cited the Congressional Budget Office, which estimated the bill would cost the federal government more than $190 billion over the next decade.

Following pressure from House Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer plans to bring it up for a vote this week. It will be further debated on Wednesday.

‘It would ensure Americans are not erroneously denied their well-earned social security benefits simply because they chose at some point to work in their careers in public service,’ Schumer posted on X.

The Senate version of the bill has 62 cosponsors, 14 of them Republicans. Its proponents want to see it voted through and brought to President Joe Biden’s desk before it expires on December 31.

Its high-profile Republican cosponsors include Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Vice President-elect JD Vance.

As the vote inches closer, there are some members of the GOP who are debating the bill’s impact on the long-term financial health of Social Security, The Hill reported.

Well-known fiscal hawk Senator Rand Paul, a Republican of Kentucky, wants his colleagues to vote on an amendment to the bill that would gradually raise the retirement age to 70.

‘It speeds the bankruptcy of Social Security. Social Security is due to go bankrupt in 2034. This will speed it up by a year or so. It’s $200 billion added to a program that is already short of money,’ he told The Hill. ‘If you’re going to add to its mandate by expanding it, you should pay for it.’

If passed, the bill would get rid of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO), two tweaks to Social Security that have been in place since 1983.

Right now, the WEP lowers benefits for workers who also receive a public pension from a job that’s not covered by Social Security, or jobs where employer aren’t paying into the program.

For instance, many public schools across the country have opted out of participating in Social Security taxes.

If a teacher from one of those schools works part-time during the summer at a job that is covered under Social Security, the WEP makes it so their eventual benefits are commensurate to the hours they worked at that part-time job.

This was done to prevent public sector workers from ‘double-dipping’ by collecting a public pension and full Social Security benefits even if their main job didn’t pay into the program.

The GPO cuts two-thirds of the Social Security benefit received by spouses, widows or widowers who collect pensions from work that wasn’t covered by Social Security taxes.

In reality, these two provisions mean millions of Americans collecting Social Security have their benefits reduced by hundreds of dollars per month.

That is true for Terry Hoover, who was a firefighter for 20 years in Louisville, Kentucky. Now retired, he said the WEP and GPO cost his family more than $1,000 every month.

‘My Social Security is reduced due to my pension,’ Hoover said at a rally earlier this week. ‘And then my wife, she was a nurse for 41 years and paid into the Social Security system, you know, and I cannot draw one penny off of her because of my pension.’

The CRFB argued that these reforms will wreck Social Security in the long term, even though retirees will see more money in their checks in the short term.

‘Rather than repealing WEP/GPO and adding roughly $200 billion to Social Security’s shortfall, lawmakers should reform them,’ it wrote. ‘We encourage lawmakers to pursue solutions to Social Security’s looming insolvency and not further worsen the program’s finances.’

Related Posts

Judge Fined Leavitt $100K for Insulting Biden, 7 Minutes Later, Bondi Cuffed Him

In a dramatic turn of events that has left the political and legal communities buzzing, a judge has fined former Congressional candidate Karoline Leavitt $100,000 for allegedly insulting…

BREAKING: The Rock Declines $200 Million Role at Disney, States He Won’t Participate in “Woke Culture”

In an unexpected twist that has sent shockwaves across Hollywood, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, one of the industry’s most bankable stars, has reportedly declined a staggering $200 million…

The Vatican announces that Pope Francis has passed away

Pope Francis, the first Latin American leader of the Roman Catholic Church, died, Reuters reported. The information was announced by the Vatican in the video notice on April…

Tesla Is No Longer Elon Musk’s Most Valuable Asset

**Breaking News: Tesla Falls Behind as Musk’s SpaceX Surges Ahead** In a stunning turn of events, Tesla is no longer the crown jewel of Elon Musk’s empire, as SpaceX has officially surpassed the electric vehicle giant in value for the first time in five years. Musk’s fortune, once heavily anchored by Tesla, has shifted dramatically following a series of alarming developments. Musk’s financial landscape took a hit after he funneled over $200 million into Donald Trump’s re-election campaign, but he rebounded quickly, briefly becoming the world’s first $400 billion individual. However, Tesla’s stock has since plummeted by 50%, exacerbated by disappointing delivery numbers and concerns over Musk’s divided attention as he juggles his new role in the Trump administration. Recent reports indicate that Tesla’s revenue growth has stagnated to a mere 1% in 2024, while net income has declined for the second consecutive year. Meanwhile, shocking drops in vehicle sales have been documented across key markets, including Germany, China, and Australia. As public sentiment turns against Musk, protests have erupted at Tesla dealerships nationwide, amplifying the urgency of the situation. The turmoil doesn’t end there. Musk’s appeal of a Delaware court ruling that invalidated a lucrative pay package has further complicated his financial stability. Forbes has slashed the value of Musk’s stock options by 50%, revealing that his stake in Tesla is now worth $97.8 billion, significantly less than the soaring valuation of SpaceX. With SpaceX’s value now estimated at $147 billion—almost $20 billion more than Musk’s Tesla holdings—this shift marks a seismic change in Musk’s financial narrative. SpaceX’s revenue surged by 51% to $13.1 billion in 2024, buoyed by the booming Starlink satellite internet service. As the dust settles, it’s clear that Musk’s fortunes are in flux, and the landscape of his empire is shifting dramatically. Stay tuned as we continue to monitor these developments closely.

Tesla Is No Longer Elon Musk’s Most Valuable Asset

**Breaking News: Tesla Falls Behind as Musk’s SpaceX Surges Ahead** In a stunning turn of events, Tesla is no longer the crown jewel of Elon Musk’s empire, as SpaceX has officially surpassed the electric vehicle giant in value for the first time in five years. Musk’s fortune, once heavily anchored by Tesla, has shifted dramatically following a series of alarming developments. Musk’s financial landscape took a hit after he funneled over $200 million into Donald Trump’s re-election campaign, but he rebounded quickly, briefly becoming the world’s first $400 billion individual. However, Tesla’s stock has since plummeted by 50%, exacerbated by disappointing delivery numbers and concerns over Musk’s divided attention as he juggles his new role in the Trump administration. Recent reports indicate that Tesla’s revenue growth has stagnated to a mere 1% in 2024, while net income has declined for the second consecutive year. Meanwhile, shocking drops in vehicle sales have been documented across key markets, including Germany, China, and Australia. As public sentiment turns against Musk, protests have erupted at Tesla dealerships nationwide, amplifying the urgency of the situation. The turmoil doesn’t end there. Musk’s appeal of a Delaware court ruling that invalidated a lucrative pay package has further complicated his financial stability. Forbes has slashed the value of Musk’s stock options by 50%, revealing that his stake in Tesla is now worth $97.8 billion, significantly less than the soaring valuation of SpaceX. With SpaceX’s value now estimated at $147 billion—almost $20 billion more than Musk’s Tesla holdings—this shift marks a seismic change in Musk’s financial narrative. SpaceX’s revenue surged by 51% to $13.1 billion in 2024, buoyed by the booming Starlink satellite internet service. As the dust settles, it’s clear that Musk’s fortunes are in flux, and the landscape of his empire is shifting dramatically. Stay tuned as we continue to monitor these developments closely.

Elon Musk Has Made Many People Rich. Not His Ex-Wives

In a striking exposé, Forbes reveals the stark financial reality faced by Elon Musk’s first wife, Justine Wilson, amidst his monumental rise to wealth. While Musk has amassed a staggering $364 billion, Justine is left with a mere $15 million. The shocking contrast serves as a painful reminder of their tumultuous past, which includes the tragic loss of their first 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 and the 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 of five more. Married from 2000 to 2008, Justine’s life took a drastic turn as she navigated the complexities of motherhood and her husband’s burgeoning career, which would eventually propel him to the top of the global wealth hierarchy. Despite her sacrifices and contributions, including publishing three novels, Justine’s financial fate diverged sharply from Musk’s explosive success. The divorce proceedings were fraught with conflict. Justine’s requests for a fair share of Musk’s burgeoning empire—which included 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 support, Tesla shares, and a Glacier Blue Tesla Roadster—were met with resistance. Musk initially offered $80 million, but Justine rejected the settlement, hoping for equity in his growing companies. Instead, she ended up with substantially less after a long legal battle that saw Musk’s wealth skyrocket. The ramifications of their divorce continue to echo today, illustrating not just the vast inequities in wealth distribution among ex-spouses but also Musk’s controversial approach to family and financial agreements. As he expands his “legion of 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥ren” with multiple partners, the story of Justine Wilson stands out as a cautionary tale of what can happen when an extraordinary ascent to wealth leaves the personal behind. For full details, visit Forbes.com and read the comprehensive article by Ker Dolan and John Hyatt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *