On August 24, 2025, an argument broke out between two American sports icons when Michael Phelps, a legendary swimmer, criticized LeBron James, a famous basketball star, about a statement that was thought to be disrespectful to the American flag. Phelps, who holds a record with 23 Olympic gold medals, did not hesitate to express his indignation, declaring that the lack of respect for the national flag is equivalent to insulting the soldiers who sacrificed to protect it. Phelps’ sharp saying quickly attracted attention on social media platforms, especially X, where fans divided into two mixed opinions.

The controversy originated from a recent comment of LeBron James, in which he was said to have made a comment that was considered disrespectful to the American flag in an interview. Although the exact content of this statement is still controversial, it has sparked a strong wave of reaction from the public. Some people think that James is only expressing personal views on social issues, while others, like Phelps, feels this action is unacceptable, especially in the context of the symbolic meaning of the flag to the United States.

Phelps, famous for his patriotism and dedication to the country, used his platform to emphasize the importance of honoring the values ​​that the flag represented. He reminded that the flag is not only a piece of cloth, but a symbol of sacrifices, freedom and solidarity. “When you disrespect the flag, you are disrespectful to millions of people who have put their lives to protect what it represents,” Phelps said, emotional voice. This statement has received strong support from those who agree, but also faces criticism from those who think that James has the right to freedom of speech.

Meanwhile, LeBron James has not officially responded to Phelps’ statement. However, James supporters argued that he often used his position to talk about social injustice issues, and his statement may have been misunderstood or taken out of the context. This argument once again highlights the division in American society on how to see national symbols and freedom to express their views.

This incident is not only a debate between the two individuals, but also reflects deeper tensions in the society of patriotism, freedom of speech and the meaning of national symbols. As both sides continue to get attention, the question is whether this controversy will lead to a constructive dialogue or just deepen the division.