In a dramatic courtroom showdown that has sent shockwaves through the media, a furious judge has emphatically rejected Prince Harry’s plea for UK taxpayer-funded security, declaring, “You can’t use taxpayer money!” The explosive exchange unfolded during a contentious hearing where Harry, reportedly under the influence of Meghan Markle, insisted he deserves state-funded protection despite stepping back from royal duties in 2020.

The courtroom was charged with tension as the judge demanded clarity on the legitimacy of Harry’s request, given his recent lucrative deals with Netflix and Spotify. Critics have condemned the couple’s perceived entitlement, arguing they are out of touch with the realities faced by ordinary citizens. The judge’s scathing remarks highlight a growing frustration over the couple’s attempts to retain royal privileges while distancing themselves from the responsibilities that come with them.

As the drama escalates, Meghan Markle’s role has come under scrutiny. Insiders allege she pushed Harry to pursue this controversial case, framing it as a matter of principle. However, her motivations are questioned, with many viewing her actions as self-serving. Since their royal exit, Meghan has often portrayed herself as a victim of the monarchy while profiting from her royal connections, raising eyebrows about her influence on Harry’s decisions.

This latest legal battle underscores a broader debate about the privileges of non-working royals. The judge’s stark warning was clear: if you abandon the crown, you forfeit its perks. As public backlash mounts, this courtroom clash may mark a pivotal moment in the ongoing saga of Harry and Meghan, illuminating the stark divide between their chosen life in California and the expectations of the British public.