In a shocking turn of events, Halle Bailey broke down in tears outside a Los Angeles courtroom after filing for a restraining order against rapper DDG, citing disturbing allegations of abuse. The 25-year-old Disney star’s emotional plea to the court has sent ripples through the entertainment industry, revealing the stark contrast between her public persona and the alleged horrors she faced behind closed doors.

On May 13, 2025, Bailey presented evidence detailing a pattern of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse from her former partner, 27-year-old DDG, whose real name is Daryl Dwayne Granberry Jr. The judge swiftly granted a temporary restraining order, mandating DDG to stay at least 100 yards away from Bailey and their 18-month-old son, Halo.

Bailey’s harrowing testimony disclosed a violent incident from January 2025, during which DDG allegedly pulled her hair and slammed her face against a steering wheel, resulting in a chipped tooth. Court documents include chilling photographic evidence of her injuries, as well as claims of ongoing emotional harassment through DDG’s extensive social media platforms.

Despite their previously celebrated relationship, which had appeared idyllic to fans, the couple’s dynamic reportedly deteriorated following their breakup in October 2024. Bailey’s court filings reveal escalating tensions and conflicts over 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 visitation, as she struggled to establish a consistent schedule for Halo amidst DDG’s unpredictable behavior.

As the news spread, social media erupted with reactions, dividing fans and sparking intense debates over the allegations. While Bailey’s supporters rallied behind her, others questioned the timing and motivations behind her claims. The drama escalated further when DDG, caught live-streaming at the moment the news broke, expressed disbelief and suggested the allegations were false.

The next hearing is set for June 4, 2025, where the court will decide whether to extend the restraining order. Until then, the entertainment world watches closely, aware that the implications of this case extend far beyond the individuals involved, potentially influencing how similar allegations are treated in the public eye.