In a shocking turn of events, Judge Hannah C. Dugan, infamously dubbed the “backdoor judge,” has lost a desperate motion to dismiss criminal charges against her. The Eastern District of Wisconsin court has ruled against Dugan, who stands accused of concealing an illegal alien from federal authorities during a courtroom proceeding, a move that could have severe implications for her judicial career and the integrity of the legal system.

The court’s decision comes after Dugan attempted to argue that her actions were protected under judicial immunity, claiming she was merely performing her duties as a judge. However, the court rejected this notion, emphasizing that her conduct—facilitating the escape of a defendant wanted by ICE—was a blatant obstruction of justice. Dugan’s alleged actions, which included ushering the illegal alien out of her courtroom while victims were present, have drawn widespread outrage and scrutiny.

This ruling marks a significant setback for Dugan, who had hoped to evade prosecution by framing her conduct as part of her judicial responsibilities. The court’s decision underscores a critical legal precedent: judges are not above the law, especially when their actions compromise federal enforcement efforts. As the legal battle intensifies, the implications of this case extend beyond Dugan herself, raising urgent questions about judicial accountability and the intersection of state and federal law.

With a court hearing scheduled for next week, the stakes are higher than ever. As federal authorities continue their crackdown on cartel-related crimes, the focus now shifts to how this case will unfold and what it means for the future of judicial conduct in America. The “backdoor judge” saga is far from over, and all eyes will be on the courtroom as this unprecedented case continues to develop.